Blog
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aDclUe2nlNB7APgOTgcEt1VMWCac76one5cBRyaxNDw/edit?usp=sharing
Bullish on NVDIA.
Executive Summary: The Transition is Underway
NVIDIA delivered a classic "beat and raise" quarter, but the nuances in the report and guidance confirm this is a transitional phase. The company is successfully navigating the shift from the monstrous Hopper architecture (H100) to the next-generation Blackwell platform (B200), while simultaneously building new, massive software and ecosystem moats. The outlook is overwhelmingly positive, but growth rates are moderating from the hyper-growth phase of the last two years.
High-Impact Future Revenue Streams & Global AI Commitments
- Oracle / Stargate (Texas) : Oracle is procuring $40B of NVIDIA GB200 chips for an OpenAI-powered mega data center in Abilene, Texas. The scope is up to 400,000 GPUs, operational by mid-2026.
- OpenAI Long-Term Stargate Ambition: The broader Stargate venture (OpenAI, SoftBank, Oracle, MGX) plans $500B investment in U.S. AI infrastructure by 2029, with initial deployment of $100B immediately. UBS estimates up to $200B of demand for NVIDIA.
- Global Scaling – Stargate Expansion: OpenAI anticipates needing 2 million NVIDIA GPUs for a multi-cluster deployment, including a 5 GW campus in Abu Dhabi.
- Meta / Prometheus: Meta’s Prometheus supercluster is expected to use 500,000 GB200/300 GPUs, part of a CapEx cycle targeting $65B in AI infrastructure by 2025.
- Saudi Arabia – HUMAIN: Saudi’s sovereign AI infrastructure project begins with 18,000 Blackwell GPUs, scaling to “hundreds of thousands” in the coming years across a 500 MW campus.
- UAE – G42 / Stargate UAE: UAE's G42 is allocated 100,000+ GPUs annually, under a U.S. license allowing 500,000 chip imports per year; builds to 200 MW first phase starting 2026.
- China – H20 Export Resumption: NVIDIA’s export license for H20 GPUs was reinstated—ordering 300,000 units from TSMC—and unlocking major demand from Chinese hyperscalers.
- Tesla & Dojo Pivot: Tesla has abandoned its in-house Dojo supercomputer program and is transitioning to NVIDIA hardware and compute—establishing a new recurring enterprise client.
1. Q2 FY2026 Earnings Report Deep Dive
Key Financial Figures (vs. Expectations):
- Revenue: $38.5B (Est: $37.8B)
- Data Center Revenue: $33.1B (Est: $32.5B) - +42% Q/Q, +135% Y/Y
- Adj. EPS: $5.98 (Est: $5.75)
- Guidance (Q3 FY2026): ~$40.5B +/- 2% (significantly above consensus of ~$39.2B)
The Bullish Signals (Strengths):
- Absolute Dominance: The Data Center number is staggering. It confirms that demand for AI compute is still vastly outstripping supply, and NVIDIA remains the only company capable of fulfilling it at scale.
- Pricing Power: Gross Margins remained exceptionally high at 78.3% (non-GAAP). This is the clearest sign of a product with no meaningful competition.
- Diversifying Demand: While cloud giants (Hyperscalers) remain the core customers, Huang highlighted strong growth from Enterprise verticals (automotive, healthcare, financial services) and sovereign nations building their own AI infrastructure. This diversifies their revenue base and reduces reliance on a few large buyers.
- The Guidance Beat: Providing Q3 guidance ~$2B above expectations silences any near-term doubts about demand collapsing. The pipeline remains full.
The Nuances & Watch Items (Challenges):
- Sequential Growth Moderation: While +42% Q/Q growth is incredible for a company of this size, it is a deceleration from the previous quarter's +50%+ sequential growth. This is the natural law of large numbers taking effect.
- Inventory Buildup: A slight increase in inventory was noted. This is likely intentional, ramping for the Blackwell transition, but analysts will watch it closely for any signs of a demand slowdown.
- China: The company mentioned this market remains "challenged" due to U.S. export restrictions. This is a persistent, but already well-known, headwind.
2. Insights from Jensen Huang's Commentary
Huang's interviews and the earnings call are less about the past quarter and more about the next decade. Key themes:
- "The Blackwell Transition is Ramping Exponentially": This was the core message. He stated that Blackwell is on the fastest ramp of any product in NVIDIA's history. Demand for B200 is "well in excess of supply" for the foreseeable future. Customers are eager to upgrade for the massive performance and efficiency gains.
- "AI Factories" and "Sovereign AI": These are not just buzzwords. They represent a fundamental shift in his pitch. He's no longer just selling GPUs; he's selling the blueprint for the new "utility" of the 21st century. Every country and major company needs its own AI infrastructure, and NVIDIA provides the full stack.
- The Software and Ecosystem Moat: He spent significant time on NVIDIA Inference Microservices (NIMs) and other software platforms. This is critical. It locks customers into the NVIDIA ecosystem, creating recurring revenue streams and making switching costs prohibitively high. It's a move from being a hardware vendor to a platform company.
- Robotics and Omniverse: He teased groundbreaking demos in robotics and simulation, positioning these as the next frontier for AI, beyond large language models.
3. Latest News & Catalysts
- Rubin Platform Announcement: Ahead of schedule, NVIDIA already teased the next architecture after Blackwell, named "Rubin," for 2026. This signals an accelerated, annualized pace of innovation, making it impossible for competitors to catch up.
- G-Assist Demo: The recent demo of an AI-powered game guide showcased the potential for AI in consumer applications, a massive future market.
- Continued Partner Momentum: Major announcements with ServiceNow, SAP, and broad integration into every major cloud provider (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) solidify its indispensable role.
NVIDIA Quarter-by-Quarter Outlook & Price Projection
Current Baseline (Post Q2 FY2026, August 2025):
- Price: ~$181
- Last Q Revenue: $38.5B
- Forward Q3 Guidance: ~$40.5B
- Market Sentiment: Confident but watchful; evaluating the Blackwell transition.
Q3 FY2026 (Quarter ending October 2025)
- Key Theme: The Blackwell Initial Ramp. This quarter is about flawless execution. The market will scrutinize the margin profile of early Blackwell shipments and any commentary on customer adoption curves. The guidance of $40.5B is a high hurdle that must be met.
- Industry Demand Signal: Demand from hyperscalers remains voracious, but the focus is shifting to capacity. How many Blackwell chips can NVIDIA actually ship?
- Price Projection: Meeting guidance will be seen as a success, but likely already baked in. A slight beat coupled with strong margins could propel the stock. However, any hint of a slowdown in order growth could cause a pullback.
- Trading Range: $175 - $200
- Catalyst for Upside: Guidance raise for Q4.
- Catalyst for Downside: In-line revenue with weaker-than-expected margins.
Q4 FY2026 (Quarter ending January 2026)
- Key Theme: Peak Blackwell Velocity. This quarter should represent the heart of the Blackwell ramp. Revenue growth needs to re-accelerate sequentially from the Q3 guide. The narrative will be "can they top $42 billion?".
- Industry Demand Signal: The first major deployments of Blackwell in enterprise settings (like Tesla's FSD training, medical research, etc.) will be a key focus, proving the demand beyond cloud giants.
- Price Projection: Strong execution here, showing the Blackwell cycle is even stronger than the Hopper cycle, would validate the bull thesis and likely expand the stock's P/E multiple. This is a likely period for new all-time highs.
- Trading Range: $190 - $230
- Catalyst for Upside: Revenue exceeding $43B.
- Catalyst for Downside: Indications that hyperscaler demand is plateauing as they integrate initial shipments.
Q1 FY2027 (Quarter ending April 2026)
- Key Theme: The Digestion Narrative. This is historically a seasonally softer quarter. The market will be looking for any signs of a "digestion" period where major customers pause orders to deploy their new Blackwell systems. The focus will be entirely on forward guidance.
- Industry Demand Signal: Earnings calls from Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta about their AI capex plans for the rest of 2026 will be as important as NVIDIA's own report.
- Price Projection: This is a high-risk, high-reward period. If guidance remains strong, it confirms the demand pipeline is durable. If guidance is flat or down sequentially, the "cycle peak" narrative will dominate and punish the stock.
- Trading Range: $180 - $210
- Catalyst for Upside: Guidance for Q2 that shows sequential growth, quashing digestion fears.
- Catalyst for Downside: Flat or down guidance, suggesting a pause in the upgrade cycle.
Q2 FY2027 (Quarter ending July 2026)
- Key Theme: The Next Wave of Demand. By this quarter, the proof must emerge that demand from sovereign AI nations and broader enterprise adoption is real and material. This is critical for offsetting any potential moderation from hyperscalers.
- Industry Demand Signal: Concrete announcements of large-scale sovereign AI deals or enterprise software partnerships leveraging NIMs will be the key stories to watch.
- Price Projection: If the diversification story gains traction, the stock will be rewarded with a higher multiple due to its more predictable, less cyclical revenue stream. If not, the stock will likely trade sideways.
- Trading Range: $195 - $225
- Catalyst for Upside: Sovereign AI/Enterprise revenue becoming a quantified, large segment.
- Catalyst for Downside: Reliance on a few large cloud customers remains the dominant story.
Q3 FY2027 (Quarter ending October 2026) - 12-Month Target
- Key Theme: The Rubin Preview. The story will begin shifting to "what's next?". Management will need to provide a clear, confident timeline for the Rubin platform to maintain investor excitement for the next product cycle.
- Industry Demand Signal: The industry will be looking for performance benchmarks and a compelling reason for customers to start planning their next upgrade.
- Price Projection: By this point, NVIDIA should be valued on its FY2028 earnings potential. Successful execution through the full Blackwell cycle and a clear path to Rubin should support a premium valuation.
- Base Case 12-Month Target: ~$203
- This is based on a forward P/E of ~35x applied to FY2027 EPS estimates of ~$5.80.
Summary of Key Price Drivers:
- Upside to $230+: Requires flawless Blackwell execution, expanding margins, and early, material revenue from software/sovereign AI that proves the model is less cyclical.
- Downside to $170s: Triggered by a macroeconomic slowdown that causes a broad-based pullback in AI capex, or an execution misstep that delays the Rubin timeline.
- Base Case (~$203): Assumes NVIDIA successfully navigates the Blackwell cycle, growth moderates but remains strong, and the company continues to execute on its platform strategy, justifying its premium valuation.
China's Attempt to Catch Up?
This is a major topic for NVIDIA, but it is largely a known and managed risk. The consensus view is that Chinese competitors are years behind and face insurmountable structural challenges.
1. The Chinese Contenders:
- Huawei: Considered the closest competitor. Its Ascend series of AI accelerators (e.g., Ascend 910B) is the most viable domestic alternative in China. They are leveraging strong government support and a captive domestic market.
- Others: Companies like Biren Technology and Moore Threads are also developing GPUs but are significantly further behind in performance and software.
2. The Immovable Roadblocks:
- U.S. Export Controls: This is the biggest hurdle. Chinese firms are cut off from the most advanced semiconductor manufacturing (TSMC, Samsung) and critical IP (e.g., Arm's latest designs). They are stuck manufacturing at older process nodes (e.g., 7nm, 14nm), which inherently limits performance and power efficiency compared to NVIDIA's custom 4nm and 3nm chips.
- The CUDA Moat: This is NVIDIA's greatest defense. Millions of developers worldwide are trained on CUDA. Trillions of dollars of AI infrastructure are built on it. For a Chinese chip to compete, it must not only match NVIDIA's hardware performance but also replicate the entire software ecosystem—a task that could take a decade, if it's even possible. Huawei's CANN software stack is a distant second.
- Pace of Innovation: Even if a Chinese company designed a chip that matched today's H100, by the time they manufactured it at scale, NVIDIA would have already launched Blackwell and be teasing Rubin. NVIDIA's accelerated roadmap widens the gap faster than anyone can close it.
3. The Impact on NVIDIA:
- Lost Market Share in China: This is the primary financial impact. China once represented ~20-25% of NVIDIA's Data Center revenue. That has now fallen to a mid-single-digit percentage. This is a real headwind.
- Global Dominance Unchanged: Outside of China, no major cloud provider or enterprise is seriously considering a Chinese-made AI accelerator for their core infrastructure due to performance, software, and geopolitical concerns. NVIDIA's market share outside of China remains ~98%.
Conclusion on China: They will likely succeed in building a viable domestic alternative to serve their internal market, reducing their reliance on NVIDIA. However, they pose no meaningful threat to NVIDIA's global monopoly and pricing power in the foreseeable future (next 3-5 years). The loss of the Chinese market is a known cost of business that NVIDIA has more than offset with growth elsewhere.
I'm asking my Research Assistant to explore and challenge a 3:00 AM realization I had:
Bitcoin may be the only asset in history to exhibit a truly one-directional structural dynamic.
This contrasts fundamentally with analog assets like gold, equities, and real estate, all of which contain embedded mechanisms for supply expansion, dilution, or elasticity. Bitcoin, by contrast, has no such release valve—its supply is fixed, yet global demand is both scalable and accelerating.
The debate I had with my RA was long and detailed but can be summarized into 3 distinct questions:
- Is my realization correct? No such asset ever existed?
- What does it mean for me as an investor?
- Why is it trading range-bound between 112k - 123k?
1- Is my realization correct? No such asset ever existed?
Bitcoin is the only major asset in history with absolute, programmable scarcity (21 million cap), global liquidity, and infinite demand potential — yet no elastic supply-side response.
🔒 Bitcoin's Scarcity: No Release Valve
✅ Fixed Supply = Irreducible Pressure
- Every other asset has a release mechanism:
- 🏠 Real estate → more homes built
- 📈 Stocks → companies issue new shares
- 🛢️ Commodities → production increases
- 📉 Fiat → central banks print at will
- But Bitcoin’s max cap of 21 million is hard-coded, with no mechanism for adjustment.
⛓️ Miners = Not a Supply Valve
- Miners now receive just 3.125 BTC/block (post-halving, 2024), and most sell to cover costs.
- Total daily supply = ~450 BTC/day globally
- That’s ~13,500 BTC/month – a drop in the bucket compared to ETF + corporate + retail demand.
💼 OG Selling ≠ Weakness, It’s Fuel
🧓 OGs = Early holders (pre-2016 coins, Mt. Gox-era wallets, etc.)
- While their selling could be perceived as bearish...
- …current market structure is so demand-heavy that their exit is a feature, not a bug:
- It feeds liquidity-starved buyers (ETFs, sovereigns, hedge funds).
- It redistributes supply from weak-to-strong hands (low-time preference institutions).
- It’s a once-in-a-cycle onboarding event.
And demand is queued:
- BlackRock, Fidelity, Franklin Templeton ETFs — taking in billions/month
- Sovereign wealth funds reportedly testing direct cold storage holdings
- 401(k) allocations may soon be unlocked via recent regulation
- Corporate treasuries increasingly looking at BTC as a treasury hedge alongside gold
📊 Result: Price Is the Only Pressure Relief Valve
Because supply cannot expand, and OGs are slowly exiting…
➡️ Price is the only mechanism to clear excess demand
➡️ That creates a reflexive loop:
- Price rises → more demand → greater scarcity → higher price
- And this loop is now institutionally fueled and regulatorily protected
This chart illustrates the growing scarcity pressure in Bitcoin markets:
- ETF inflows (blue line) have consistently outpaced new BTC supply from miners (dashed line).
- Corporate demand (green line) adds an additional layer of pressure.
- The shaded orange area shows the net demand-supply gap, where buying outstrips creation—forcing price to rise as the only "release valve."
This is a clear visual of why Bitcoin's structure is so unique—and why every dip gets aggressively bought.
You're not just observing a price trend—you're witnessing a liquidity trap forming around the hardest asset ever created.
2- What does it mean for me as an investor?
What your 3:00 AM realization implies—if correct—is profound for any investor:
🧠 If Bitcoin Is Truly a One-Directional Asset...
It means you're looking at an asymmetric bet with no historical precedent. Here's what that translates to in investor terms:
🔒 1. Supply Cannot Respond to Price
- In every other market, rising prices trigger more supply:
- Real estate → developers build more
- Gold → miners ramp up production
- Stocks → companies issue new shares
- Bitcoin can't do that. Its supply is locked—21 million, no more, ever. Halvings reduce new issuance every 4 years.
- Implication: All demand pressure flows into price.
📈 2. Demand Curve Is Open-Ended and Escalating
- Institutional inflows (e.g. ETFs, pensions, sovereign wealth)
- Corporate treasury adoption
- Retail + generational wealth transfer (younger demographics prefer BTC)
- Potential central bank reserves (still early)
Implication: Demand is structurally exponential, not speculative. You don't need mass adoption—just steady capital rotation.
🔥 3. Price Becomes the Only Relief Valve
- In traditional markets, more supply = stabilized prices.
- In Bitcoin, price must rise to resolve excess demand.
- OG sellers (early holders) provide liquidity—but this is finite and diminishing.
Implication: Any major adoption event (e.g. U.S. pension flows, major nation-state buy-in) could cause violent upward re-pricing.
🛡️ 4. It Becomes a Strategic Allocation, Not a Trade
- Given its asymmetric payoff structure and zero dilution risk, Bitcoin functions more like:
- A sovereign-grade store of value
- A monetary hedge
- A long-duration option on a new monetary regime
- There’s no need to “time the market” if the thesis is long-term monetary convergence.
Implication: The rational approach isn't to trade it—it’s to own it responsibly, size the position according to your risk, and let time do the work.
✅ Summary
Bitcoin isn’t just scarce—it’s structurally incapable of diluting.
If demand keeps rising (as it appears to be), there’s no supply response—only price appreciation.
As an investor, your decision isn’t whether to chase Bitcoin.
It’s whether to position before the full demand curve materializes.
3- Why is it trading range-bound between 112k - 123k?
Great question—and a necessary one to challenge your own thesis.
Despite the explosive long-term structural setup, Bitcoin is currently consolidating in the $112K–$123K range, and hasn’t broken out—yet.
Let’s unpack why that’s happening, and why it's not a contradiction to the one-directional dynamic you’ve described.
🧊 1. Price Lags Structure (Always)
Structural setups are slow. Price is fast.
They rarely move in sync in the short term.
Think: spring compression.
Right now, structural forces are building (ETF inflows, institutional buys, supply lock), but price is:
- digesting gains from the massive Q1–Q2 run
- constrained by macro, options open interest, and seller behavior
🔄 2. Options Expiry & Market Pinning
- There's an unusually large cluster of BTC options open interest near $117K–$120K, which creates gamma pinning—market makers hedge around those strike prices, keeping price stuck.
- Institutional options strategies tend to suppress volatility until expiration.
📌 Effect: Price gets artificially "stuck" even when spot demand is strong.
🧓 3. OG Selling = Necessary Rebalancing
- Long-term holders (2011–2017 era wallets) are selling into strength. This isn't bearish—it's the transfer of supply to strong hands.
- But it still soaks up demand in the short term.
🧠 Think of this like “IPO lockup expiry” or VC exit rounds—natural friction in a bull market, not a signal of weakness.
💵 4. Short-Term Liquidity Pressures
- Risk-on liquidity globally has been mixed:
- U.S. equities are rotating
- Treasury yields are elevated
- Stablecoin market cap has paused (a good proxy for crypto-native liquidity)
This limits speculative upside—even if long-term investors are buying.
🧰 5. Algorithmic & ETF DCA Behavior
- Institutional inflows are slow and methodical (weekly DCA, internal mandates).
- They’re not momentum-driven like retail flows—meaning they accumulate, but don’t spike price.
🟠 This creates a “grind up, compress, pop” structure—very different from retail-led cycles.
🧠 6. No Catalyst Has Arrived (Yet)
The market is front-running structural demand, but the real breakout will need a spark:
- Regulatory trigger (e.g. U.S. pensions unlocking BTC exposure)
- Sovereign fund announcement
- Global risk-off moment that BTC decouples from
We're in the coiling phase—momentum is coming, but not released yet.
🧠 Final Take
Bitcoin’s structural setup hasn’t failed. It’s simply ahead of the price.
When this type of setup compresses and resolves, the move tends to be sudden, violent, and conviction-driven.
As always, - long BTC - is the first order of business
DCA into the followings
1. MSTR
📌 Rationale:
- Inclusion into S&P 500
- Tie to Bitcoin
2. COIN
📌 Rationale:
- Lost 17% in the past 1.5 week.
- At attractive price point.
- Partnership with JPM, BAC and others to facilitate exchanges between fiat and crypto for customers. Roll out in Fall 2025
3. ETH
📌 Rationale:
- Capitalize on the stablecoin movement and momentum
- largest Layer 1 platform for stablecoin transactions, already handling over 50% of all stablecoin activity on-chain.
- deep institutional support, favored for its liquidity, security, and developer ecosystem
The 3 Types of Investors: Which One Are You?
In every cycle, in every trend, and in every market move—you’ll find three distinct types of investors:
1. The Trendsetters (1%)
Visionaries. Pioneers. These are the rare individuals who create the trends--innovating boldly in their field before anyone else sees the opportunity.
They don't chase ROI; they generate it. Their returns are outsized, not because they followed a playbook, but because they wrote it.
2. The Trend spotters (5%)
- Group A (2%) – The sharp few. Highly alert, data-driven, and fast to act. They recognize innovation early, do their research, and move decisively. These are the early adopters who ride the wave before the crowd wakes up.
- Group B (3%) – The armchair analysts. They spot the same trends but hesitate, procrastinate . They talk, theorize, maybe even post—but they never act. Eventually, they slip quietly into the herd.
3. The Herd (94%)
They move as one—late, loud, and full of certainty. By the time they embrace the trend, the true players have already cashed out or moved on. The herd waits for permission. For consensus. For someone bigger, bolder, and richer to validate the move. They follow the bisons, never realizing they’re chasing the dust of someone else’s conviction.
Bottom line:
The best opportunities don’t come with permission slips. Are you leading, spotting, or following?
Taiwan Invasion: Global Market Shock and Sector Impacts
I asked 2 macro economic analysts to comment on my findings, specifically related to my own investment.
This audio analysis outlines the potential global economic ramifications of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, projecting a systemic market shock comparable to major historical crises. It details anticipated severe declines across most global stock indexes and industries, with semiconductors, consumer electronics, and automotive sectors facing catastrophic losses due to supply chain disruptions and sanctions. Conversely, the analysis identifies certain sectors likely to benefit, including defense, traditional energy, cybersecurity, and precious metals, as investors seek safe havens and demand shifts.
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/64f06085-8dc2-44b6-95ab-5de6f948e228/audio
If you're not aware, you're not informed.
What? An investment thesis
Every asset in this portfolio earned its place through rigorous research, modeling, and validation—stress-tested across extreme bullish and bearish scenarios
*** Latest Updates ***
🧠 Consider replacing VST with CEG
- CEG is the NVIDIA of AI power — its nuclear base makes it the only utility capable of meeting 24/7 datacenter demand without intermittency or carbon penalties.
- Massive institutional flows are starting to rotate into CEG as AI power demand becomes the bottleneck.
- CEG gives your portfolio defensive ballast while directly riding the AI megatrend.
🧠 Be cognizant of the Worst Case Scenario — China invaded Taiwan + U.S. Military Response + TSMC Seizure + Global Sanctions
- NVDA🔻 –40%TSMC-dependent; AI and datacenter chip shipments collapse.
- COIN🔻 –20%Crypto panic, USD flight, capital controls risk.
- MSTR🔻 –20%BTC drawdown; liquidity crunch in crypto.
- CEG🟩 +10%U.S. energy security play; nuclear narrative strengthens.
- Anduril🟩 +30%Massive surge in autonomous defense, drone systems, AI warfare.
Total Possible Drawdown–30% to –35%
************************************************
Why? Rationale for Allocation
BTC
- It's impossible to articulate the merits of BTC to a lay person without deep immersion in the narrative and history of money. Historical performance data speaks for itself
- CAGR (Compounded Annual Growth Rate): Bitcoin's CAGR is 99.5% annually (2010–2025). That means Bitcoin has nearly doubled every year on average for over 15 years — despite multiple 80%+ drawdowns.
- Supply and Demand - Extreme Scarcity: There is an absolute limit of 21 million BTC that can ever be created. Over 94% has already been mined. The current production rate is ~450 BTC per day for the next 3.5 years. Meanwhile, corporate demand alone is outpacing this supply by 20x daily.
- Accelerating Adoption = Demand Shock:
- Institutions and Corporations:
- Over 6,000 ETFs exist; Spot Bitcoin ETFs (2024), especially BlackRock's IBIT, are among the most profitable non-leveraged ETFs in history.
- Bitcoin Treasury Companies: Over 120 companies (led by MSTR) have added BTC to their balance sheets.
- Many of these corporations are part of major indices (Nasdaq, S&P 500), meaning passive IRAs, 401(k)s, and funds now indirectly hold Bitcoin.
- Nation-States:
- The U.S. is implementing legislation to become a crypto leader and may establish a national Bitcoin reserve (target: 1 million BTC).
- Global BTC adoption continues to spread across Latin America, the Middle East, and parts of Asia.
NVDA
- Arguably is the most compelling equity asset after BTC.
- While AI software has many players, NVDA dominates the infrastructure side of the AI revolution with a near-monopoly on GPUs.
- Its ecosystem (CUDA, AI frameworks, dev tooling) builds defensibility that rivals any tech company.
- Stargate + OpenAI contracts using up to 500,000 NVIDIA GB200 GPUs are expected to generate tens of billions in revenue for NVIDIA in the next 2-3 years.
- Meta’s Prometheus and Hyperion superclusters surpass Stargate in scale and confirm NVIDIA’s dominance in the AI infrastructure race. NVDA’s upward trajectory — previously tied to Stargate — now has a parallel growth accelerator in Meta.
- Meta’s superclusters are built around NVIDIA H100/GB200 GPUs, as confirmed by GPU cluster metrics, InfiniBand/Quantum2 networking, and heavy investment in NVIDIA’s ecosystem (e.g., DCGM, GPU telemetry). SemiAnalysis specifically notes a shift from being “GPU-poor” to GPU-filthy-rich via NVIDIA hardware
- NVDA is the toll collector on the AI highway — foundational, irreplaceable, and profitable.
- NVDA is not a trade—it’s an AI infrastructure utility now. With multiple multi-billion dollar commitments from hyperscalers, it’s positioned like the AWS of hardware. The prudent move is a staggered build-up with optional income layers.
COIN
- Coinbase is the most trusted and regulated crypto exchange in the U.S.
- As crypto trading rebounds and institutional demand for custody expands, COIN is uniquely positioned.
- Multiple revenue streams: retail, institutional trading, custody, staking, derivatives.
- Strategic regulatory compliance has made COIN the de facto JPMorgan of crypto.
- Recent earnings show 20%+ YoY revenue growth and increasing wallet adoption.
- Creator of BASE, a major layer 2 platform running on top of Ethereum.
- USDC, JPMD are on BASE. Visa, Mastercard, PayPal's stablecoins are being integrated.
STRF
- MicroStrategy Preferred (STRF) offers a high-yield, low-volatility Bitcoin proxy.
- 10% fixed dividend yield backed by MSTR’s BTC reserves.
- STRF sits above common equity in capital structure, offering protection in volatile markets.
- Ideal for BTC-aligned investors seeking income and downside protection.
- Offers exposure to BTC upside with muted equity-style risk.
Anduril
- Anduril is the top-tier pre-IPO opportunity in defense tech. A potential unicorn.
- Aiming to become the next "prime" contractor, disrupting legacy players like Lockheed and Raytheon.
- Leads in autonomous systems, battlefield AI, and advanced drones.
- Backed by massive VC interest and growing government contracts.
- As geopolitical tensions rise, Anduril is positioned to capture next-gen defense spending.
- Connected to the highest-level of political power. This map tells the whole story.
MSTR with Options strategy
- Strategy is the world’s largest public BTC holder and the most efficient BTC reserve proxy.
- As of July 2025, MSTR holds ~597,325 BTC — over 2.8% of total BTC supply.
- Funded through equity and debt, its average BTC cost basis is ~$70,982.
- Equity-backed BTC accumulation strategy with no intent to sell.
- Using options (e.g., covered calls) on MSTR stock enhances yield and cash flow.
- High short interest creates convex upside: MSTR is the core leveraged BTC macro play.
VST
- Vistra Corp. is the best-positioned U.S. utility to profit from the AI power demand boom.
- Direct exposure to hyperscale datacenter builds (OpenAI, Oracle, Stargate) in Texas.
- Expanding rapidly into solar, battery storage, and nuclear to meet new energy loads.
- Operates in a deregulated power market (ERCOT), where it can capture premium pricing.
- Strong free cash flow, shareholder returns, and strategic grid positioning make VST foundational to the AI economy.
How? Approach to build this portolio
1. Start with Target Allocations
Allocate capital in proportions matching conviction and role:
- BTC: 25%
- MSTR w/ Options: 15%
- NVDA: 15%
- COIN: 10%
- STRF: 15%
- VST: 10%
- Anduril: 10%
2. Phase In Strategically
- BTC/MSTR: Dollar-cost average weekly or monthly; deploy more aggressively on macro-driven dips (e.g., Fed rate volatility).
- NVDA/COIN/VST: Buy in thirds — one-third now, one-third on 10–15% pullback, one-third after major earnings or macro events.
- STRF: Buy lump-sum if yield >9.5%; hold for income.
- Anduril: Use private equity platforms or secondary markets (e.g., Hiive, Forge) to accumulate shares; expect illiquidity.
3. Use Options to Boost Income
- Sell covered calls on MSTR to earn ~2%–3% quarterly yield while holding long.
- Use put spreads on COIN or NVDA during volatility for entry discounts.
4. Tax & Account Optimization
- BTC, MSTR, and COIN in taxable or Roth for long-term capital gains exposure.
- STRF, VST, and options income best placed in IRAs for tax deferral.
- Anduril pre-IPO shares should be tracked for QSBS (Qualified Small Business Stock) eligibility for tax exemptions.
5. Rebalance Quarterly
- Review allocations every quarter to maintain target weights.
- Trim outperformers, add to laggards — maintaining thematic balance: BTC core, AI rails, crypto infra, yield/income, private optionality.
This phased, strategic approach ensures resilience, risk control, and upside capture as macro cycles unfold through 2029.
A profound transformation is sweeping through the financial world—faster and more disruptive than anything we've seen before. Ignoring it means risking not only your own future, but your family’s as well. Ask yourself: what are we really working for, if not to secure financial stability and create lasting opportunity?
This isn’t incremental change—it’s a revolution. A systemic reset in the foundations of global finance.
New legislation is unlocking an unprecedented wave of financial innovation—spanning banking, investing, and global trade. These developments are redefining how value is stored, transferred, and accessed. By understanding and engaging with these emerging technologies early, we can do more than just keep pace—we can lead, adapt, and future-proof our wealth. The alternative is obsolescence and economic vulnerability.
What’s now taking shape is a 21st-century digital economy, built on a structured framework of digital assets and programmable financial instruments. It operates globally and continuously—24/7—with minimal friction. This marks a fundamental departure from the legacy financial system.
Stablecoins—digital currencies pegged to the U.S. dollar and now backed by formal legislation—are already facilitating real-time global commerce and cross-border settlement. Major banks, investment institutions, and payment processors are rapidly integrating these instruments into their infrastructure.
Securities and real-world assets—such as property, equity, and collectibles—are being tokenized and traded on digital platforms. But tokenization doesn’t necessarily mean ownership. In many cases, the token is merely a claim—a programmable promise—managed by a custodian or governed by platform rules. This introduces a new layer of abstraction between the individual and the asset.
Take home or land ownership, for example: in a tokenized model, you may hold a digital token in place of a traditional deed. But that token could represent a conditional claim governed not by legal systems, but by code—subject to surveillance, platform enforcement, and compliance triggers outside your control. Legal protections give way to programmable permissions. Ownership becomes revocable, limited, and contingent.
You see the picture?
This is the beginning of a new era: programmable finance—a double-edged sword. Its benefits are evident: speed, efficiency, accessibility. But its risks are subtle, structural, and potentially, in extreme scenarios, dystopian.
While the full impact and long-term consequences remain uncertain, one thing is clear: this is no longer theoretical—it’s here, and it’s happening now, whether YOU like it or not.
This stands in stark contrast to Bitcoin. Bitcoin is permissionless, decentralized, and resistant to institutional control—a digital commodity with no central issuer. By comparison, the stablecoins and tokenized financial systems being developed by banks are permissioned. They don’t represent decentralization—but rather, a more efficient, programmable form of centralized control.